Is anyone planning on watching the lie debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson concerning the Charlie Kirk murder and those responsible for it or not? Personally, I don’t;t plan wasting 3 or more hours of my time listening to something that is probably less a debate and more of a scream fest (at least from one side) and even though it’s been hyped like the Event of the Century, it’s not. A debate is characterized by a proposition presented, with at least two views :, one of which is against the proposition. Most of what I’ve witnessed in my ife as debates wouldn’t come close to qualifying as such and even more, the people invlved are less qualified to speak for or against whatever the topic may be /9think of political “debates”). This one, comng soon to an Internet channel near you, will probably grate at each side without ever answering the proposition. And what will the proposition be? OF course, at the end, each “side” will claim victory because, unlike an actual debate, there won’t be anyone (independent) there to judge which facts are legitimate and which aren’t. wel, at least it will raise the profile of at least one of the participants. Or lower it.
