Being Skeptical

With the Internet becoming the main source of information for most people today, a little reminder to always be skeptical of what you read and see on te net. Why? There is so much misinformation out there and sometimes it’s difficult to discern between what is true or not. In fact, it’s easy to be fooled by what we see because it’s so well presented. The information may also play into our confirmation bias. A recent example is something I noticed on X the other day about that woman on trial for allegedly killing her 3 children. Supposedly the jury came back with a verdict of not guilty by reason of instanity. That post went viral for a little while until someone came on and said, “Wait, the trial isn’t even over yet”, and suddenly, the comments on that post went to zero. But for a little while, people actually thought the verdict was in and the post was true. When I saw that post, I was home so I just turned on the TV, to a news channel, to discover there were people, right then, talking about the upcoming closing arguments. TV off and I went back to doing other things. Note all the information out there about the Iran conflict, the Russia/Ukraine war, not to mention what’s going on where you live with the finally soon to be over midterm elections. In all of these, stay skeptical, remembering the rule of 3: Three independent sources. If 3 sources agree, you can be fairly confident the information is true (I say “fairly confident” because the media in general has been fooled before.) . Always remain skeptical because you’re the only one looking out for you.

Screen Blind

I remember thinking, when I first joined Twitter (X) some years back, about how much personal information people post about their personal lives. Not just themselves, but their families – including their children – to the degree I got to know some of these people, that I’d never met and still haven’t, more than my own. family. That was very strange to me t the time and after all of these years, it still seems that way to me today. Why would anyone want to post their most intimate details of their lives to thousands (millions?) of complete strangers?

Continue reading

A Post About Nothing

I’m happy to see the reemergence of the English language. What? You say. The English language disappeared? When did that happen and how is it I am still speaking colloquial english? What I’m referring to are the people that decided, a minority by the way, that some words just may not be used in polite society. But some of these words have been used for decades, if not longer, without anyone in particular being damaged by the word itself.

Continue reading

Death and Celebrity

So, Dolly Parton, a legendary Country and Western entertainer, died today. Although I wasn’t much of fan of C&W music, I grew up with her as my parents definitely were C&W fans. Yes, I remember the Porter Waggoner Show in the 1960’s and Dolly’s regular appearances. In fact. she may have been my first infatuation as a teenager. I really didn’t follow her career but still it’s sad to see someone of that kind of iconic (is it okay to say that?) stature, gone. It really brings home, at least to me, that we’re all gere on a temporary basis, some more temporary than others, but all the same at some point.

Continue reading

Remove the “De” and the Title is Correct

When 10 men tell you you‘re drunk, it’s time to lay down. That seems to be the consensus about the so-called debate between Andrew Wilson and Candace Owens concerning the death of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point, an organization to inform young people about politics and moral and ethical values. Since Mr. Kirks untimely death, there have been a number of people questioning the official account, the most prolific and most widely viewed over the Internet being Candace Owens. Andrew Wilson, a self proclaimed Master Debater, challenged Ms. Owens to a debate to prove, once and for all, the state of Utahs evidence against the accused killer versus her thoughts and opinions about said evidence. The outcome was surprising to some, but not to most.

Continue reading