This Is What You Voted For

/ Jim
The west front of the United States Capitol. Photo: Architect of the Capitol, via Wikimedia Commons [Public domain]

The counting is not finished. Alaska and Mississippi are still out, and the exact size of the new House majority depends on which counter you ask. But control is settled: Democrats will hold both houses of Congress when the new Congress is sworn in this January, and the last two years of Donald Trump’s presidency will be divided government. Predictions about what that means are free, and worth what they cost. The winners have been more specific than the predictors. They said what they intended to do before Tuesday, and they have said it again since. So what did you actually vote for?

The board, as it stands

Democrats have won 54 Senate seats in called races, with seven flips and every one of them in the same direction — Iowa, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas. Republicans flipped none. Two races remain uncalled. In Alaska, Mary Peltola leads Senator Dan Sullivan by 637 votes, with the ranked-choice tabulation set for November 18. In Mississippi, Scott Colom leads Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith by 2,574 votes in a state with no recount law to appeal to. If both leaders hold, the Senate is 56 to 44. If one flips, it is 55 to 45. Either way, it is a Democratic Senate.

The House is Democratic as well; the Associated Press called control of it early Wednesday morning. The final size of the majority is genuinely not known yet — the published counts differ by source and by the hour, because dozens of races are still being counted — and any single number printed as final today would be a guess wearing a suit. What is known is that it is a working majority, comfortably past the 218 needed.

One pattern from election night survived verification, and it is worth a line of its own: both of the appointed senators who had to face the voters lost. Jon Husted in Ohio, appointed to fill JD Vance’s seat, lost to Sherrod Brown. Darline Graham in South Carolina, appointed by the governor after her brother Lindsey Graham’s death in July, lost to Annie Andrews. Appointment gets a person the title. It does not appear to get them the voters.

What changes hands without anyone’s signature

Start with the part of this that does not require the president’s cooperation, because it is the largest part.

Committee chairs change. Subpoena power changes hands with them. Investigations, hearings, document demands — none of that needs a bill, a signature, or 67 votes. It needs a gavel, and the gavels move in January. In the Senate, Sheldon Whitehouse is in line to chair the Judiciary Committee, with Dick Durbin retiring. And confirmations simply stop: a Democratic Senate is not going to confirm this president’s judges or his nominees, no matter how qualified or unqualified they are. That power does not get debated. It ends on January 3.

What they say they will do

This is an inventory, not a warning. These are the new majority’s own statements, made before the election and repeated after it, which is the part worth checking — a promise that survives winning is the only kind that counts.

Costs first. Chuck Schumer, who will return as majority leader, told NBC before the election that a Democratic majority would “lower costs, end all this rampant corruption and end the chaos. Plain and simple.” On Wednesday, with the Senate won, he said the same thing in the same order: “The first thing we are going to do is reduce people’s costs,” and he named lowering the cost of living, ending the Iran war, and investigating allegations of corruption in the White House as the majority’s priorities. “We are going to work hard to drive costs down with the president or without him.” Hakeem Jeffries, in line to be Speaker, has run on the same word for a year: affordability. “America is too expensive” is his refrain, and his first-hundred-days list includes reversing the Medicaid cuts enacted last year, extending the Affordable Care Act premium credits, an expanded child tax credit, a housing credit, and changes to tariff policy. Election night, he said the American people had made clear they’d had “enough of the extremism, enough of the corruption.”

End the war. Both leaders named ending the Iran war among the first priorities. Whatever else divides them from the White House, that one is stated plainly by both men, before and after.

Accountability. Schumer, again on Wednesday: “Americans are calling for accountability, not accommodation.” And then the sentence that will be quoted for two years: “Whenever Trump defies the will of the American people or the law, we will launch investigations, take him to court, and entangle him in legislative razor wire. The days of Trump’s supplicant Senate are over.” Jeffries has described the oversight effort as a plan to “hold the crooks accountable,” and the Democrats expected to run the key committees — Robert Garcia at Oversight, Jamie Raskin at Judiciary — have their lists ready: the president’s business dealings and cryptocurrency ventures, his family’s relationships, the accepted jet from Qatar, Elon Musk’s role in the administration, immigration enforcement. Three days before the election, Jeffries told a rally that one of the first things a Democratic majority would do is “run Pete Hegseth out of town.” That was said before the votes were counted, and it is on the record.

And the subject nobody raised. The loudest prediction made about a Democratic House — and I made a version of it myself, in print, before the election — was impeachment. It is worth recording what the incoming Speaker said when he was asked about it on Thursday, because it was not what the prediction required. Nobody has brought it up to him, Jeffries said. The talk is affordability. Take the man at his word, with one honest caveat: he said it in November, before he holds the gavel, and whether any Speaker can hold a caucus to its stated agenda the way Nancy Pelosi held hers is a thing that gets proven over two years, not in a week. Behind him sits the arithmetic anyway. The House can impeach on a majority. The Senate convicts on 67 votes that do not exist in any arrangement of the new Senate. An impeachment that cannot convict is theater, and the incoming leadership is at least saying, so far, that it has other plans for its time.

The wall

Now run the inventory through the filter that governs the next two years. Everything on the legislative list — the Medicaid reversal, the tax credits, the tariffs, ending the war by law — has to pass both houses and then be signed by Donald Trump, or survive his veto. Trump has said he will veto the Democratic priorities; he has also, in the same breath, hinted at deals. A veto override takes two-thirds of both chambers, and two-thirds of both chambers does not exist: it would require Republicans by the dozen voting against their own president in the House and the Senate alike. Killing the filibuster does not change that arithmetic, because a bill still needs a signature at the end of it, and 67 is unreachable from every direction.

So the realistic shape of the next two years is this: investigations and hearings at full volume, confirmations stopped cold, and legislation that mostly serves as a record of what each side wants — until the bills that cannot be allowed to fail come due. Government funding and the debt limit are where divided government actually has to govern, because the alternative is a shutdown or a default that damages everybody holding office. That is where the negotiations, and the real concessions, will live.

The other side’s remaining moves

The outgoing majority is not idle, and its most consequential remaining business is the Senate’s oldest constitutional function. Chuck Grassley, who chairs the Judiciary Committee until January, has scheduled judicial nomination hearings on back-to-back weeks beginning November 10 — a faster pace than the committee’s usual — to take up nine pending nominees, with another thirteen already-heard nominees positioned for confirmation votes before Christmas. The White House says it expects every pending judicial nominee to be confirmed this year. Whether you approve of the nominees or not, that is the system working exactly as designed: a majority using the power it still holds, for as long as it holds it, on the one category of business that will outlast everything else decided this fall. Judges serve for life. The razor wire serves for two years.

Republicans have also been reported to be weighing party-line moves in the lame-duck session — a budget reconciliation bill and the debt limit — while they still hold both levers. That is reported as a possibility, not a settled plan, and it is filed here as exactly that.

As for what the losing side says comes next for itself, the clearest statement came from the vice president. JD Vance, after the results, laid out four points: end the war, address the cost of living, America First, and change the relationship with Israel — a list his own side is now arguing about in public. The president’s own verdict was shorter: the war was worth it, it contributed to the losses, and he stands by his defense secretary. Those are their words, recorded the same way as the other side’s.

The standard

James Talarico, who won the Texas Senate race going away, was pressed on television this week about things he has said in the past about God and gender. He did not litigate the quotes. He said, in substance, that you don’t believe anything politicians say — you believe what they do — and pointed to his record in the Texas House.

That is the right standard, and it is the one this inventory is built for. Everything above is the say: what the winners promised before they won, what they repeated after, what the outgoing majority is doing with its remaining weeks, what the losing side says it learned. It is written down now, while it is fresh, so that the do can be graded against it later without anybody’s memory getting a vote. This is what you voted for. The next two years will show what you got.

Read more:

Leave a Reply