So there were 2 stories in the media this week that seemed to get the left and the media (wait! those are the same aren’t they?) in a bit of a tizzy. I found both to be rather silly myself but hey, it must have been a slow news week. I mean, there really is nothing else going on around the country or the world that might be more important, is there?
With the exception of local, I rarely watch the news anymore. In fact, it’s been this way since the 2016 election that I’ve rarely tuned into any of the cable news channels. It actually started before then, when I discovered that most of the cable channels viewed our previous President as The Second Coming. Sickening sycophants . Not much has changed.
There’s a tremendous amount of conversation lately, since the election, about “Fake News”. Even Hillary Clinton went out of her way at Sen. Harry Reid’s retirement to talk about it extensively. I think she was looking for someone other than herself to point the finger at for her loss.
There’s a reason that people are less and less likely to trust the news now days. Take this “Breaking News “ headline from the CBC:
Although the tweet was “technically accurate”, it focused on the shooting of the 2 attackers. I wonder, if after 9/11 had there been a headline like this:
“19 Men Die After Hijacking Three Planes” if that may have caused any controversy.
Of course, an hour later, they begin to tell the story:
Why is the media in such a rush to “break” news before they have the story? They all do it, and often, they get the story completely wrong in the beginning. Why not take the extra time before trying to beat your competition? Is being first better than being right?
In these days, it looks like it.
It looks like Time Magazine has apologized for including the word “Feminist” in their poll for which words should be banned in 2015.