What Should be Done to Restore Free Speech For All on Campus?

 

free speech

I’ve been following a discussion on Twitter concerning free speech. Not a lot, or in depth because I’m attempting to spend a lot less time on that platform that I used to, but a few minutes here, a few minutes there, during the day, I’ve noticed an extended dialogue on this very important topic in my mind. I didn’t peruse the thread as I normally would have, but I think I read enough, scrolling through, to get the gist of what was being said. MAybe not, but instead of participating there, I thought I may throw my two cents in here.

It’s not an easy subject to tackle. Yes, here in the United States we have a constitutionally protected right to free speech that no other country has. Other countries, as we all know, have enacted laws against hate speech which is very slippery in my mind because what one person may consider unlawful speech, another may not. That’s why there are no such laws here in the U.S. even though there seems to be a growing percentage of the population that would be okay for restrictions to speech.   There are already restrictions but those are to protect life. No one may directly incite violence against another person or group of people without consequences.

There’s a lot of different areas that the concept of free speech may be considered, but I’d like to focus here on the same on college and university campuses. It seems, at least to me, that in the past decade or more, the concept of free speech has become less a priority for many of these institutions of higher learning. on campus, most especially to those that hold conservative viewpoints. That’s right, free speech on college campuses seems to be only available to those that profess a liberal or progressive point of view. There may be instances where they, too, have been prevented from holding events, but it seems I never read about any of those.

I’m so old I recall when debating ideas on campus was welcome, even encouraged. Not so much anymore and what we, the public see are orchestrated attempts to silence any point of view, by a minority by the way, that doesn’t believe that a contrary view to what appears in some cases to be religiously held beliefs by some, are validated. Universities have not seemed to make any attempt to rectify the situation and in fact, in some instances, have required conservative student groups to pay enormous amounts of money for security, in the event that violence breaks out. that’s right, violence. Instead of having the campus police protect the event, it seems they want to protect those that would disrupt, even to the point of violent confrontation.

There are no laws that would protect any of these groups to their right of speech on campus, other than those of assault. Just disrupting an event is not illegal. In fact, those students disrupting are exercising their free speech to the detriment of others with a different viewpoint, and universities and colleges are loathe to make any stand for protections of speech for all.  It’s really interesting that those who do not stand up for speech for all do not seem to be the least embarrassed by the video or the stories of their institutions allowing these incidents to occur. It hasn’t seemed to hurt their bottom line, revenue, which seems to be all they are interested in preserving. That may be changing sooner rather than later.

On March 2nd this year, President Trump gave a speech at the yearly CPAC (Conservative  Political Action Convention) where at one point he addressed these situations on campus, pointing directly to the recent assault of a conservative student, caught on video, at Berkeley . In that address he mentioned he was considering an Executive Order to protect speech of all students on campus with those not abiding the order, to lose their access to federal grants. Yearly, the federal government  dispense billions in grant money to colleges and universities. If implemented, this could affect programs at some institutions for years, even killing some of the same.

I’m conflicted about this idea of punishing the majority on campus, for the acts of a few. It’s a bad precedent to set because a future administration could use the same reasoning to force colleges and universities to implement their pet projects. Oh wait! That’s already happened, hasn’t it? I recall the letter going out from the Obama Administration, known as the Dear Colleague Letter, advising them to do more about sexual assault on campus. This led, of course, to the kangaroo courts at colleges and universities that more imitated North Korean justice. than U.S.

Is there a way for the government to encourage campuses to protect the speech of all students without a threat of removing some funding? IT seems that in society today, we often approach similar problems with a carrot-and-stick approach. Will we see an Executive Order by the administration addressing fre speech on campus as outlined by the President, or is the threat of one enough to start these institutions, moving on their own? I tend to be less optimistic that without the stick, nothing will change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “What Should be Done to Restore Free Speech For All on Campus?

  1. The First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

    A person has the “right” to shout “Fire” in a crowded theater and the police have the responsibility to arrest the shouter, and the court to judge if the person created a situation that caused panic and the victims of the ensuing panic have the right to sue for their injuries. Shouting “Fire” when there is no fire would not be a wise thing to do, but one is free to do it.

    So-called “Hate Speech” is really just speech that not everybody approves of. If this sort of speech is done to incite violence, then there are laws that cover that.

    Hate Speech is free speech and protected under the first amendment. Slander is free speech, but one leaves oneself open for a law suit.

    It is not the speech itself that is unlawful, it is the result of that speech that can be prosecuted if need be.

    All speech must remain free and unfettered by any group that would “infringe” upon it. A free people must allow hateful speech, disgusting speech, irritating speech..”I may disagree with what you are saying, but I will defend your right to say it.” That sort of notion is what America is supposed to be.

    If universities or public schools, which receive federal funding refuse to protect the First Amendment rights of their staff and students, then yes, they should face the loss of our tax dollars.

    We have allowed a minority to move the Overton Window for much too long and to move it much too far during these past few decades.

    Our Constitution, which includes the Bill of Rights, is in serious jeopardy and equally serious steps must be taken to save it, to save us, to save America.

    It is way past time that we, who “believe” in the Constitution and the concept of America, even with all its warts, demanded that our federal government “cling” to our Constitution.

    Like

  2. I realize that the free speech reply isn’t complete. It is within the rights of those at public events, such as a campus lecture, to use their free speech to shout down the lecturer. Yes, but it is within the right of the university to demand decorum. It is also the right of those hosting other public hearings or lectures to demand decorum and to punish or arrest those people that cause disorder.

    Actions have consequences. The current problem with society is that it has failed for too long to make that rule stick across the board. You disrupt and behave like an ass or incite disorder and/or violence and you suffer the consequences.

    There are now barely any consequences for disruptive student behavior in our public schools. There are no guidelines for student behavior and there is no discipline. Thank you Barrack Obama… Like it wasn’t bad enough already with teachers fearing lawsuits and censure for virtually nothing.

    Government shouldn’t be in the business of “encouraging” any citizen to do anything, but we passed that milestone a long time ago.

    How do we return our colleges, etc. to a place where civil discourse and debate is part of the experience offered to broaden young minds? Make it hurt in the pocketbook, because I am afraid that is the only currency that means much to the Business of higher education.

    And, while the federal and state governments are at it, let’s force actual diversity upon our tax guzzling university systems. Most of them depend heavily upon government grants to keep running, so we should at least make them toe the line. Keep those discrimination suits coming to the Ivy League schools and don’t sit down and shut up.

    And for gawd’s sake, don’t send your children to colleges where they can’t broaden their minds by engaging in civil discourse.

    Maybe the sport of football will fall by the wayside, thereby killing the goose that lays the golden egg at the college level. That is when college and universities became all about making money, just like any big business.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s