I don’t know what to think after the “Great Debate” between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson last week, but I know people are still talking about it and depending on how much you dislike one or the other, are taking sides thusly. Personally, I don’t know either of these people and have only followed Candace for a few months and Andrew, maybe a month. I found him interesting whn I first watched him online but after a short time, I saw that he was nothing more than a boorish lout, all bluster and no substance and his real claim to fame was debating Only Fans girls. No really. Look him up on the Internet and see how muchh time he’s spent doing just that. Yes, he’s had a couple of Joe rogan appearances as well, but it doesn’t appear to have done anything for his reputation.

Candace did well in the debate but I believed she could have been better by not allowing her opponent any grace whatsoever as it appeared he wasn’t going to be graceful to her at all. At every turn, she actually helped him in his argument by supplying information that he clearly didn’t know the most obvious being when he couldn’t name any of the charges against the person charged with the assassination. There were several other instances where she let him slide on his lack of knowledge instead if hammering him on these specifics.

The part of the discussion where Andrew described the bullet was wrong, 100% and proved that his claim of “teaching rifles” was most likely false as well as his claim of being a gunsmith and owning his own gun business. He didn’t know the difference between a frangible and soft point round. Right there, the entire spectacle could have ended if Candace had challenged hi on this fact.

It looks like some people are wanting there to be a round to, but I I were Candace, I’d just smile and politely explain that there’s no reason to give Andrew another chance to show himself as the Master Debater he’s known to be – to himself. He also promised to release some information that TPUSA only gave him, which he talked about in the debate but didn’t offer the exact text messages he supposedly had. Since then, nothing as far as I know and unless one of his sycophants (you may have to explain what that means to him) prompts him to do so, he probably won’t. Why? Because it doesn’t exist.

I think 60 years from now, no matter the outcome of the upcoming trial, people will still be talking about this and arguing over the evidence.That’ll be for another generation.