The Lunacy Continues


I’m fairly certain I haven’t heard so much screeching about a possible Supreme Court nominee ever in my lifetime. The pending retirement of Justice Kennedy has the left so freaked out, its even inspired some of their allies in the media to predict the doom of America and the rollback of basic civil rights.

All anyone needs to do is read this article in the New Yorker from esteemed (sarcasm) Legal Analyst for CNN, Jeffrey Toobin. In a single paragraph, Tobin outlines what the left fears from another appointment by President Trump:

It will overrule Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban abortions and to criminally prosecute any physicians and nurses who perform them. It will guarantee that fewer African-American and Latino students attend élite universities. It will approve laws designed to hinder voting rights. It will sanction execution by grotesque means. It will invoke the Second Amendment to prohibit states from engaging in gun control, including the regulation of machine guns and bump stocks.

I’m fairly certain I’ve never read this level of lunacy in my life, especially from someone that’s supposed to know and understand law. Understand that he is a regular pundit on CNN and this is what many on the left are hearing since the announcement of Kennedys retirement.

Everything he writes in the above paragraph could be considered not a legal opinion, but a product of a paranoid mind. I can’t imagine what has him believing any of this drivel.

I’ve addressed what I think about the Roe decision here and also the Masterpiece Cake Shop decision, here. I’m not sure what Toobin is talking about when he says, “It will allow shopkeepers, restaurateurs, and hotel owners to refuse service to gay customers on religious grounds.” Has he never heard of public accommodation law? The Masterpiece decision was not based on religious freedom, but on religious bias – bias against a religion – by government.

Toobin goes on to state basically that non-white students will be prevented from attending the best universities. On what basis? I can only think he’s referring to Affirmative Action law which the court has ruled on in other cases.

Voting rights? Here. Executions? Yep, here. Finally the 2nd Amendment, here.

Could the court overturn previous decisions? Sure they could. They have in the past and will probably do again in the future, but its rare.

This article though does nothing but stir up those on the left that imagine only the worst possible scenarios for the future. All of us, no matter our political leaning, should reject it.

3 thoughts on “The Lunacy Continues

  1. I think the demented Left (and those of their ringleaders who are merely pretending to be demented) should be encouraged to expend their energy on a situation they can do nothing about.

    Kennedy’s replacement will be decided solely on the number of votes in Congress, uninfluenced by rabid street tantrums.

    But meanwhile, the deranged protesters will be deflected away from protests that may actually influence policies that will harm America, such as dissolving our borders.

    So let them rant on!


    • Watch how much of what Toobin has written will be in the media this next week. The outrage will be tangible. Of course, whoever Trump picks will be approved by the Senate. Too many Democrats in states Trump won by double-digits this year. Several will end up voting for his pick.


  2. Hyperbole has become the norm. Amidst the perpetual outrage, it seems to be the only way to get anyone’s attention. I’d guess that many on the left see this as a potential way to mobilize voters.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s